Paper 2: Strategic Growth and Spatial Distribution Options

Yes

Representation ID: 27342

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd

The HBF considers that Option 5 is the best growth option as it is both aspirational and employment led which links back to the Councils wish to be the 'economic and cultural growth engine of North Wales' (see Plans proposed vision) and the adopted Conwy Economic Growth Strategy. Its is also the most likely to meet the affordable housing requirement of the area.

Noted.

No

Representation ID: 27343

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd

The HBF do not agree with the figure and consider that it would result in a housing requirement figure that would not be deliverable.

Noted.

Yes

Representation ID: 27344

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd

We consider that Option 5 is the best growth option as it is both aspirational and employment led which links back to the Councils wish to be the 'economic and cultural growth engine of North Wales'. As the Conwy Economic Growth Strategy which looks to drive forward a higher rate of economic growth resulting in a need for between 18.8 and 24.5 ha of additional employment land (i.e. at the top end, and slightly beyond). Given that this Growth Strategy has been adopted by the Council, then the planning strategy should support the achievement of its goals.

Noted - Since publication of the Economic Growth Strategy, as part of its LDP evidence base and in line with PPW, the Council commissioned an Employment Land Review (ELR.) The ELR looks at a range of growth scenarios based on past take up rates, economic growth forecasting, population projections, relevant strategies and significant regional projects. After reviewing these scenarios, the preferred approach is the scenario which combines economic forecasts with significant regional projects. This scenario allows for upto 14ha of additional employment land (including an allowance for contingency which is based on past take-up rates.)

No

Representation ID: 27345

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd

None.

Noted.

No

Representation ID: 27346

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd

The HBF do not support options 1, 2, 3 or 6 and do not support one particular option but instead elements of Options 4, 5 and although these are described in very different ways, comparing the plans they look very similar. Accordingly, we suggest the Council look to develop a hybrid option based on these options, which gives the greatest flexibility for growth based around sustainable settlements (Urban, Satellite Settlements and the Local Service Centres), according to their ability to accommodate development, therefore providing greater likelihood of the plan being able to deliver the identified vision, objectives and needs.

Noted.

No

Representation ID: 27347

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd

The HBF do not support options 1, 2, 3 or 6 and do not support one particular option but instead elements of Options 4, 5 and although these are described in very different ways, comparing the plans they look very similar. Accordingly, we suggest the Council look to develop a hybrid option based on these options, which gives the greatest flexibility for growth based around sustainable settlements (Urban, Satellite Settlements and the Local Service Centres), according to their ability to accommodate development, therefore providing greater likelihood of the plan being able to deliver the identified vision, objectives and needs.

Agreed that flexibility is key to support the delivery of the RLDP objectives. In terms of housing, this will be through a combination of the hierarchy and housing policies.

No

Representation ID: 27348

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd

The HBF do not support options 1, 2, 3 or 6 and do not support one particular option but instead elements of Options 4, 5 and although these are described in very different ways, comparing the plans they look very similar. Accordingly, we suggest the Council look to develop a hybrid option based on these options, which gives the greatest flexibility for growth based around sustainable settlements (Urban, Satellite Settlements and the Local Service Centres), according to their ability to accommodate development, therefore providing greater likelihood of the plan being able to deliver the identified vision, objectives and needs.

Agree that there is a need to give more flexibility to growth in some of the more sustainable locations and further consideration will be given to the hierarchy for inclusion in the PS.

No

Representation ID: 27349

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd

The HBF do not support options 1, 2, 3 or 6 and do not support one particular option but instead elements of Options 4, 5 and although these are described in very different ways, comparing the plans they look very similar. Accordingly, we suggest the Council look to develop a hybrid option based on these options, which gives the greatest flexibility for growth based around sustainable settlements (Urban, Satellite Settlements and the Local Service Centres), according to their ability to accommodate development, therefore providing greater likelihood of the plan being able to deliver the identified vision, objectives and needs.

Noted.

No

Representation ID: 27350

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd

The HBF do not support options 1, 2, 3 or 6 and do not support one particular option but instead elements of Options 4, 5 and although these are described in very different ways, comparing the plans they look very similar. Accordingly, we suggest the Council look to develop a hybrid option based on these options, which gives the greatest flexibility for growth based around sustainable settlements (Urban, Satellite Settlements and the Local Service Centres), according to their ability to accommodate development, therefore providing greater likelihood of the plan being able to deliver the identified vision, objectives and needs.

Accepted in principle. A growth distribution similar to what has been suggested is planned for the Preferred Strategy and will be subject to further consultation.

No

Representation ID: 27351

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd

The HBF do not support options 1, 2, 3 or 6 and do not support one particular option but instead elements of Options 4, 5 and although these are described in very different ways, comparing the plans they look very similar. Accordingly, we suggest the Council look to develop a hybrid option based on these options, which gives the greatest flexibility for growth based around sustainable settlements (Urban, Satellite Settlements and the Local Service Centres), according to their ability to accommodate development, therefore providing greater likelihood of the plan being able to deliver the identified vision, objectives and needs.

Noted.