91 Land off Pentwyn Road (South of St Anne's Gardens), Llanrhos, Llandudno

Showing comments and forms 1 to 7 of 7

Object

Candidate Site Register

Representation ID: 27479

Received: 19/08/2019

Respondent: Georgina Taylor

Representation Summary:

Road is already too busy, cannot support more housing

Change suggested by respondent:

Loss of countryside, Pentywyn road too small to accommodate all the extra traffic that housing development would cause.

Full text:

Road is already too busy, cannot support more housing


Our response:

Service providers and Highways will be consulted and the site assessed for suitability of inclusion in the Deposit LDP.

Object

Candidate Site Register

Representation ID: 27484

Received: 19/08/2019

Respondent: Mr John Taylor

Representation Summary:

Pentywyn road already too busy

Change suggested by respondent:

The houses planned for this area would be bad for the infrastructure of this area, the road is already too busy

Full text:

Pentywyn road already too busy


Our response:

Service providers and Highways will be consulted and the site assessed for suitability of inclusion in the Deposit LDP.

Support

Candidate Site Register

Representation ID: 27516

Received: 26/08/2019

Respondent: Ms Jeanne MACINNES

Representation Summary:

With the provisos given I support this site as it has least negative impact of the other Llanrhos sites in your plan.
No developments at Llanrhos before you ensure we all have access to mobile phone signals.

Full text:

If you really ARE going to « develop » Llanrhos, then this area is least likely to impact on the whole area, being most hidden from current view.
You would have to prove that there will be sufficient increase in doctors and dentists for an area already without.
You will have to prove that there really will be need of out of town commercial premises as shown in plan, more than simply « seek » which reads more like « hope ». No expensive white elephants please, and absolutely only buildings in sympathy with surroundings.
You will have to indicate ( and commit to) how many trees you will plant both as sound barriers, antipollutants and as screening for St Annes Gardens.
You will have to prove that access traffic can be safely managed and will not add to the delays already experienced at the St Annes Gardens junction.

Attachments:


Our response:

noted. Service providers and Highways will be consulted and the site assessed for suitability of inclusion in the Deposit LDP.

Object

Candidate Site Register

Representation ID: 27531

Received: 29/08/2019

Respondent: Mrs Tracey Warburton

Representation Summary:

The area is already busy with a large volume of traffic it would not be able to cope with more houses being built leading to more traffic problems and negative impact on residents.

Change suggested by respondent:

Don't build the area cannot cope

Full text:

The area is already busy with a large volume of traffic it would not be able to cope with more houses being built leading to more traffic problems and negative impact on residents.


Our response:

Service providers and Highways will be consulted and the site assessed for suitability of inclusion in the Deposit LDP.

Object

Candidate Site Register

Representation ID: 27567

Received: 02/09/2019

Respondent: Mr Michael Bailey

Representation Summary:

Objection to the scale and repercussions of the proposed development plan

Change suggested by respondent:

Ideally, this area should not form part of the planned development scheme, due to the impact on the wildlife, and the historical site which it abuts, the size of the development will put too much of a strain on the surrounding area, including, roads, medical and other services, the amount of recreational areas planned will not be able to be sustained combined with concerns regarding anti social behaviour.

Full text:

This area abuts the Vadre Historical area and is part of the green belt and has significant importance re nature (including badgers which reside in that area) and birds. There is already significant flooding in the whole area including Maes Y Castell fro, due to water flowing off the Vardre, these developments will surely worsen the flooding problem. According to the plans, this portion of the development will include housing and large scale recreation facilities....any development on this field will severely impact on residents already in situ, with concerns of anti social behaviour, general noise, plus loud noise from the skate park, in this quiet mostly retired area. There are already severe social problems around recreation areas in Llandudno due to drugs etc., and the police are unable to prevent these problems due to lack of resources. Clearly new areas will be unsupervised and unpoliced, and problems will ensue, especially with open spaces of the Vardre just behind this area. Also the roads around this development of 250 dwellings and a school area would not be adequate enough, and the strain would be to much on public amenities.


Our response:

Service providers and Highways will be consulted and the site assessed for suitability of inclusion in the Deposit LDP.

Object

Candidate Site Register

Representation ID: 27617

Received: 05/09/2019

Respondent: Mr Huw Owen

Representation Summary:

Unsuitable access on a road not designed for high volumes of traffic. Detrimental to the community. Area is overdeveloped and this is not sustainable. Local services can not cope. Sparse or non existent bus services.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove

Full text:

Unsuitable access on a road not designed for high volumes of traffic. Detrimental to the community. Area is overdeveloped and this is not sustainable. Local services can not cope. Sparse or non existent bus services.


Our response:

Service providers and Highways will be consulted and the site assessed for suitability of inclusion in the Deposit LDP.

Object

Candidate Site Register

Representation ID: 27751

Received: 17/09/2019

Respondent: Mr Keith Richards

Representation Summary:

I support all the community objections to this ludicrous proposal. Among many other things, it will close a wildlife corridor between Pentywyn Road and Bryn Lupus Road. Green Wedge is there for a reason.

Change suggested by respondent:

Don't do it!

Full text:

I support all the community objections to this ludicrous proposal. Among many other things, it will close a wildlife corridor between Pentywyn Road and Bryn Lupus Road. Green Wedge is there for a reason.


Our response:

Service providers and Highways will be consulted and the site assessed for suitability of inclusion in the Deposit LDP. Ecological networks will be expected to be retained and enhanced as part of any new development.