Cymraeg
No
Paper 2: Strategic Growth and Spatial Distribution Options
Representation ID: 27313
Received: 24/01/2019
Respondent: Beech Developments (NW) Ltd
Agent: The Planning Consultancy
Representation Summary:
It appears to us that Option 4 begins to get too complicated, but, in addition, we do not see why some of the settlements identified as Secondary Settlements should be distinguished from the main urban areas, of which they are functionally part or why, for example, Abergele should be 'downgraded' within the hierarchy.
Full text:
See scanned document.
Our response:
Noted.