142 Adjacent to former Rectory, Llysfaen
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 27434
Received: 11/08/2019
Respondent: Thomas Parry
The land has rare orchids and numerous other plants.
Badgers and foxes roam at night.
The school is over subscribed, there are limited facilities, no health care facilities in the village.
There is no mains gas, mains sewage facilities are inadequate.
Roads are narrow with few footpaths and poorly maintained.
We already have had more than our fair share of new houses built over the past few years.
Radon gas is high in the village. The land adjacent to Drws Y Mynydd has one or more faults running through it- affecting local property when blasting occurs in the quarry.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 27502
Received: 21/08/2019
Respondent: Mrs Daphne Morris
142 and 123 are massive proposed developments with no prospect of infrastructure.
Do not allocate 142 and 123 in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 27739
Received: 12/09/2019
Respondent: Prof & Dr Del & Ann Williams & Parry-Williams
This was allocated in the current CLDP but has not come forward.Under the policy noted at paras 4.3.17 and 4.3.18 of the RLDP this "rollover" site should be excluded from the RLDP. Planning Policy Wales (Ed 10.)states that the "supply of land to meet the housing requirement proposed in a development plan must be deliverable". There is no reasoned justification nor cogent evidence that this site meets PPW (Ed 10) deliverability tests.
Please note that, as shown on the online "Candidates Sites"map, Site 142 contains land occupied by the owners of Drws-y-Mynydd and is not co-terminous with the current CLDP.
In accordance with RLDP paras 4.3.17 , 4.3.18 and PPW 10 (Housing Delivery) this site should NOT be incuded in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28035
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Mr Kevin Cooke
Site is inconsistent with a Tier 2 village.
Land has wild orchids.
Doctors/dentists/schools oversubscribed.
Mains sewage inadequate.
Roads are narrow and no footpaths near school, this is dangerous.
Site does not meet PPW (ed 10) deliverability tests.
Llysfaen is a village and should not be overdeveloped.
Do not allocate in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28038
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Ms Rebecca Davies
Site is inconsistent with a Tier 2 village.
Land has wild orchids.
Doctors/dentists/schools oversubscribed.
Mains sewage inadequate.
Roads are narrow and no footpaths near school, this is dangerous.
Site does not meet PPW (ed 10) deliverability tests.
Llysfaen is a village and should not be overdeveloped.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28041
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Mr John Davies
Site is inconsistent with a Tier 2 village.
Land has wild orchids.
Doctors/dentists/schools oversubscribed.
Mains sewage inadequate.
Roads are narrow and no footpaths near school, this is dangerous.
Site does not meet PPW (ed 10) deliverability tests.
Llysfaen is a village and should not be overdeveloped.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28047
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Ms Antoine Johannes Botes
I object to you building on this field for various reasons. Firstly there is horses in that field that is good for the kids as there is a school nearby and calming for when people go for a stroll and kids find great pleasure of seeing the horses.
It is a small village that doesn't even have pavements now in xcertain areas to keep people and kids safe now walking so how would building more houses contribute to that. There is no gas at present as they can't cope, so how will they be able to supply others.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28049
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Ms Antoine Botes
I object to you building on this field for various reasons. Firstly there is a horse in that field that is good for the kids as there is a school nearby and calming for when people go for a stroll and kids find great pleasure of seeing the horse.
It is a small village that doesn't even have pavements now in certain areas to keep people and kids safe now walking so how would building more houses contribute to that. There is no gas at present as they can't cope, so how will they be able to supply others.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28051
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Ms Alidia Botes
I object to you building on this field for various reasons. Firstly there is a horse in that field that is good for the kids as there is a school nearby and calming for when people go for a stroll and kids find great pleasure of seeing the horse.
It is a small village that doesn't even have pavements now in certain areas to keep people and kids safe now walking so how would building more houses contribute to that. There is no gas at present as they can't cope, so how will they be able to supply others.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28053
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Ms Emma Jones
I object to you building on this field for various reasons. Firstly there is a horse in that field that is good for the kids as there is a school nearby and calming for when people go for a stroll and kids find great pleasure of seeing the horse.
It is a small village that doesn't even have pavements now in certain areas to keep people and kids safe now walking so how would building more houses contribute to that. There is no gas at present as they can't cope, so how will they be able to supply others.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached letter.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28055
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Mr Joey Valerio-Pop
I object to you building on this field for various reasons. Firstly there is a horse in that field that is good for the kids as there is a school nearby and calming for when people go for a stroll and kids find great pleasure of seeing the horse.
It is a small village that doesn't even have pavements now in certain areas to keep people and kids safe now walking so how would building more houses contribute to that. There is no gas at present as they can't cope, so how will they be able to supply others.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28057
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Andres Valerio-Pop
I object to you building on this field for various reasons. Firstly there is a horse in that field that is good for the kids as there is a school nearby and calming for when people go for a stroll and kids find great pleasure of seeing the horse.
It is a small village that doesn't even have pavements now in certain areas to keep people and kids safe now walking so how would building more houses contribute to that. There is no gas at present as they can't cope, so how will they be able to supply others.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28059
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Mr James MacKenzie
I object to you building on this field for various reasons. Firstly there is a horse in that field that is good for the kids as there is a school nearby and calming for when people go for a stroll and kids find great pleasure of seeing the horse.
It is a small village that doesn't even have pavements now in certain areas to keep people and kids safe now walking so how would building more houses contribute to that. There is no gas at present as they can't cope, so how will they be able to supply others.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28062
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Ms Karen Miles
I would like 142 and 123 being removed from the LDP as they are not consistent with a Tier 2 village.
The land on Pentregwyddel Road is a meadow and has been for the last 1000 years.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28065
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Mr Neil Thomas
I would like 142 and 123 being removed from the LDP as they are not consistent with a Tier 2 village.
The land on Pentregwyddel Road is a meadow and has been for the last 1000 years.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28068
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Ms Libby Thomas
I would like 142 and 123 being removed from the LDP as they are not consistent with a Tier 2 village.
The land on Pentregwyddel Road is a meadow and has been for the last 1000 years.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28071
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Mr Robbie Thomas
I would like 142 and 123 being removed from the LDP as they are not consistent with a Tier 2 village.
The land on Pentregwyddel Road is a meadow and has been for the last 1000 years.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28074
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Mr Dylan Thomas
I would like 142 and 123 being removed from the LDP as they are not consistent with a Tier 2 village.
The land on Pentregwyddel Road is a meadow and has been for the last 1000 years.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28146
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Frances Hill
There are ancient trees and hedgerows which will be destroyed. Rare flora and fauna, home to buzzards, badgers, bats, woodpeckers, hedgehogs, sparrows, thrushes, all these species are in decline.
Poor access, narrow lanes and roads. No spaces in schools. The resident value the rural area and have chosen to live in a village for a reason. The fields, trees and wildlife which will be destroyed if building is approved.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.