123 Adjoining Ysgol Cynfran, Llysfaen
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 27435
Received: 11/08/2019
Respondent: Thomas Parry
The land has rare orchids and numerous other plants.
Badgers and foxes roam at night.
The school is over subscribed, there are limited facilities, no health care facilities in the village.
There is no mains gas, mains sewage facilities are inadequate.
Roads are narrow with few footpaths and poorly maintained.
We already have had more than our fair share of new houses built over the past few years.
Radon gas is high in the village. The land adjacent to Drws Y Mynydd has one or more faults running through it- affecting local property when blasting occurs in the quarry.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 27503
Received: 21/08/2019
Respondent: Mrs Daphne Morris
142 and 123 are massive proposed developments with no prospect of infrastructure.
Do not allocate 142 and 123 in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 27740
Received: 12/09/2019
Respondent: Prof & Dr Del & Ann Williams & Parry-Williams
This was allocated in the current CLDP but has not come forward. Under the policy noted at paras 4.3.17 and 4.3.18 of the RLDP this "rollover" site should be excluded from the RLDP. Planning Policy Wales (Ed 10.) states that the "supply of land to meet the housing requirement proposed in a development plan must be deliverable". There is no reasoned justification nor cogent evidence that this site meets PPW (Ed 10) deliverability tests.
This site should not be included in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 27930
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Miss Karen Thomas
There is no pavements on the road leading to teh school, or clobryn road up to llysfaen even though the speed limit has been reduced this is still dangerous and more houses will cause more people walking. Our roads and infastructre cant cope with the volume of new people, Also there is wild orchids on this land. Llysfaen shoudl be a tier 2 village and should not be overly developed. Schools are having teachers made redundant, our doctors/dentists are full.
This site adjoing ysgol cynfran should be removed from LDP
There is no pavements on the road leading to teh school, or clobryn road up to llysfaen even though the speed limit has been reduced this is still dangerous and more houses will cause more people walking. Our roads and infastructre cant cope with the volume of new people, Also there is wild orchids on this land. Llysfaen shoudl be a tier 2 village and should not be overly developed. Schools are having teachers made redundant, our doctors/dentists are full.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28034
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Mr Kevin Cooke
Site is inconsistent with a Tier 2 village.
Land has wild orchids.
Doctors/dentists/schools oversubscribed.
Mains sewage inadequate.
Roads are narrow and no footpaths near school, this is dangerous.
Site does not meet PPW (ed 10) deliverability tests.
Llysfaen is a village and should not be overdeveloped.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28037
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Ms Rebecca Davies
Site is inconsistent with a Tier 2 village.
Land has wild orchids.
Doctors/dentists/schools oversubscribed.
Mains sewage inadequate.
Roads are narrow and no footpaths near school, this is dangerous.
Site does not meet PPW (ed 10) deliverability tests.
Llysfaen is a village and should not be overdeveloped.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28040
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Mr John Davies
Site is inconsistent with a Tier 2 village.
Land has wild orchids.
Doctors/dentists/schools oversubscribed.
Mains sewage inadequate.
Roads are narrow and no footpaths near school, this is dangerous.
Site does not meet PPW (ed 10) deliverability tests.
Llysfaen is a village and should not be overdeveloped.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28046
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Ms Antoine Johannes Botes
I object to you building on this field for various reasons. Firstly there is horses in that field that is good for the kids as there is a school nearby and calming for when people go for a stroll and kids find great pleasure of seeing the horses.
It is a small village that doesn't even have pavements now in certain areas to keep people and kids safe now walking so how would building more houses contribute to that. There is no gas at present as they can't cope, so how will they be able to supply others.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28048
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Ms Antoine Botes
I object to you building on this field for various reasons. Firstly there is a horse in that field that is good for the kids as there is a school nearby and calming for when people go for a stroll and kids find great pleasure of seeing the horse.
It is a small village that doesn't even have pavements now in certain areas to keep people and kids safe now walking so how would building more houses contribute to that. There is no gas at present as they can't cope, so how will they be able to supply others.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28050
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Ms Alidia Botes
I object to you building on this field for various reasons. Firstly there is a horse in that field that is good for the kids as there is a school nearby and calming for when people go for a stroll and kids find great pleasure of seeing the horse.
It is a small village that doesn't even have pavements now in certain areas to keep people and kids safe now walking so how would building more houses contribute to that. There is no gas at present as they can't cope, so how will they be able to supply others.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28052
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Ms Emma Jones
I object to you building on this field for various reasons. Firstly there is a horse in that field that is good for the kids as there is a school nearby and calming for when people go for a stroll and kids find great pleasure of seeing the horse.
It is a small village that doesn't even have pavements now in certain areas to keep people and kids safe now walking so how would building more houses contribute to that. There is no gas at present as they can't cope, so how will they be able to supply others.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached letter.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28054
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Mr Joey Valerio-Pop
I object to you building on this field for various reasons. Firstly there is a horse in that field that is good for the kids as there is a school nearby and calming for when people go for a stroll and kids find great pleasure of seeing the horse.
It is a small village that doesn't even have pavements now in certain areas to keep people and kids safe now walking so how would building more houses contribute to that. There is no gas at present as they can't cope, so how will they be able to supply others.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28056
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Andres Valerio-Pop
I object to you building on this field for various reasons. Firstly there is a horse in that field that is good for the kids as there is a school nearby and calming for when people go for a stroll and kids find great pleasure of seeing the horse.
It is a small village that doesn't even have pavements now in certain areas to keep people and kids safe now walking so how would building more houses contribute to that. There is no gas at present as they can't cope, so how will they be able to supply others.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28058
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Mr James MacKenzie
I object to you building on this field for various reasons. Firstly there is a horse in that field that is good for the kids as there is a school nearby and calming for when people go for a stroll and kids find great pleasure of seeing the horse.
It is a small village that doesn't even have pavements now in certain areas to keep people and kids safe now walking so how would building more houses contribute to that. There is no gas at present as they can't cope, so how will they be able to supply others.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28061
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Ms Karen Miles
I would like 142 and 123 being removed from the LDP as they are not consistent with a Tier 2 village.
The land on Pentregwyddel Road is a meadow and has been for the last 1000 years.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28064
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Mr Neil Thomas
I would like 142 and 123 being removed from the LDP as they are not consistent with a Tier 2 village.
The land on Pentregwyddel Road is a meadow and has been for the last 1000 years.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28067
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Ms Libby Thomas
I would like 142 and 123 being removed from the LDP as they are not consistent with a Tier 2 village.
The land on Pentregwyddel Road is a meadow and has been for the last 1000 years.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28070
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Mr Robbie Thomas
I would like 142 and 123 being removed from the LDP as they are not consistent with a Tier 2 village.
The land on Pentregwyddel Road is a meadow and has been for the last 1000 years.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28073
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Mr Dylan Thomas
I would like 142 and 123 being removed from the LDP as they are not consistent with a Tier 2 village.
The land on Pentregwyddel Road is a meadow and has been for the last 1000 years.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.
Object
Candidate Site Register
Representation ID: 28145
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Frances Hill
There are ancient trees and hedgerows which will be destroyed. Rare flora and fauna, home to buzzards, badgers, bats, woodpeckers, hedgehogs, sparrows, thrushes, all these species are in decline.
Poor access, narrow lanes and roads. No spaces in schools. The resident value the rural area and have chosen to live in a village for a reason. The fields, trees and wildlife which will be destroyed if building is approved.
Do not allocate the site in the RLDP.
See attached document.