Cymraeg
Option 1
No
Paper 2: Strategic Growth and Spatial Distribution Options
Representation ID: 27332
Received: 25/01/2019
Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd
The HBF is concerned that the first three options either relate or are based on the previous LDP Settlement Hierarchy which has not delivered the homes required to meet the identified need of the current plan.
See scanned representation.
Agreed that the current LDP has not delivered the level of housing required within the plan, but it is not accepted that the settlement hierarchy itself is the reason for this.
No
Paper 2: Strategic Growth and Spatial Distribution Options
Representation ID: 27388
Received: 25/01/2019
Respondent: Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
We don't believe Option 1 would be the best option.
See scanned representation.
Noted.
Yes
Paper 2: Strategic Growth and Spatial Distribution Options
Representation ID: 27405
Received: 25/01/2019
Respondent: Cllr Anne McCaffrey
I think we should stick with the Urban and Rural Settlement classifications and general distribution levels assigned within the current LDP.
Excessive development in rural areas inevitably means overdevelopment in areas where need is not identified, where access to services is not sustainable, where community services are non existent, limited, inaccessible or lack of resilience. This only results in greenfield land being prioritised for use.
See scanned document.
Noted.