Question 6: Do you agree with the figures and rationale for Growth Option 4?

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

No

Paper 2: Strategic Growth and Spatial Distribution Options

Representation ID: 27341

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd

Representation Summary:

The HBF do not agree with the figure and consider that it would result in a housing requirement figure that would not deliver the housing growth needed to not only support the economic aspirations of the Council but also deliver the much needed affordable housing.

Full text:

See scanned representation.

Attachments:


Our response:

Noted.

Yes

Paper 2: Strategic Growth and Spatial Distribution Options

Representation ID: 27363

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: FCC Environmental (UK) Limited

Agent: Axis

Representation Summary:

It is considered the employment led projections are more aspirational and therefore the rationale is supported. With regards to housing the option plans to meet forecasted growth levels which presume achievable levels of affordable housing. It would also provide additional employment land which would support future economic growth.

With regards to sustainable placemaking, this growth option is considered likely to have positive effects on this objective as the levels of housing and employment growth they entail would be a manageable scale of development to improve existing places and infrastructure.

Full text:

See scanned representation.

Attachments:


Our response:

Noted.

Yes

Paper 2: Strategic Growth and Spatial Distribution Options

Representation ID: 27421

Received: 05/03/2019

Respondent: Bay of Colwyn Town Council

Representation Summary:

Yes

Full text:

See scanned document.

Attachments:


Our response:

Noted.