Question 5: Do you agree with the figures and rationale for Growth Option 3?

No

Representation ID: 27340

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd

The HBF do not agree with the figure and consider that it would result in a housing requirement figure that would not deliver the housing growth needed to not only support the economic aspirations of the Council but also deliver the much needed affordable housing.

Noted.

Yes

Representation ID: 27362

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: FCC Environmental (UK) Limited

Agent: Axis

The rationale behind this methodology is supported. It is considered this will result in improved health and wellbeing outcomes through facilitating growth of the working age population and the provision of associated economic opportunities. With regards to housing, this option plans to meet forecasted growth levels which presume achievable levels of affordable housing, it is based on higher levels of population and housing growth than option 2, but is still within the range of recent housing delivery.

Depending on the extent greenfield land is used, the levels of growth could result in adverse effects on ecological, geodiversity and soil interests.

Noted.

Yes

Representation ID: 27420

Received: 05/03/2019

Respondent: Bay of Colwyn Town Council

Yes

Noted.