Question 3: Do you agree with the figures and rationale for Growth Option 1?

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

No

Paper 2: Strategic Growth and Spatial Distribution Options

Representation ID: 27338

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd

Representation Summary:

The HBF do not agree with the figure and consider that it would result in a housing requirement figure that would not deliver the housing growth needed to not only support the economic aspirations of the Council but also deliver the much needed affordable housing.

Full text:

See scanned representation.

Attachments:


Our response:

Noted.

No

Paper 2: Strategic Growth and Spatial Distribution Options

Representation ID: 27360

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: FCC Environmental (UK) Limited

Agent: Axis

Representation Summary:

This growth option scores negatively in the majority of the sustainability appraisal objectives. If progressed it would result in depopulation and a decline in the working age population. The quality of community facilities is likely to decline as working age population declines.

This would also result in a reduction in existing housing land supply meaning that housing provision would continue to fail to meet identified needs and the shortfall would be exacerbated. Without new allocations there would be no mechanism to deliver additional affordable housing.

Full text:

See scanned representation.

Attachments:


Our response:

Noted.

Yes

Paper 2: Strategic Growth and Spatial Distribution Options

Representation ID: 27418

Received: 05/03/2019

Respondent: Bay of Colwyn Town Council

Representation Summary:

Yes

Full text:

See scanned document.

Attachments:


Our response:

Noted