5.2.4

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Comment

Review Report

Representation ID: 27163

Received: 22/12/2017

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd

Representation Summary:

If any of the suggested changes already made in response to earlier sections of the document are made then this paragraph will also need to be amended particularly around the fact it blames the recession as the main reason for not achieving a 5 year land supply. Reference should also be made to the WG study 'Longitudinal Viability Study of the Planning Process' in this paragraph.

Full text:

If any of the suggested changes already made in response to earlier sections of the document are made then this paragraph will also need to be amended particularly around the fact it blames the recession as the main reason for not achieving a 5 year land supply. Reference should also be made to the WG study 'Longitudinal Viability Study of the Planning Process' in this paragraph.


Our response:

Noted.

Comment

Review Report

Representation ID: 27172

Received: 28/11/2017

Respondent: Town and Country Planning Services (Conwy)

Representation Summary:

A review of the land allocations is overdue and there is evidence of local hoarding of land to the disadvantage of other applicants. Only genuine sites over 10 units should be retained and contingency sites removed.
I support a review of the boundaries.
The rural settlement strategy requires review.
I would like the LDP to set an upper limit on any site attempting to circumvent the LDP at 20 dwellings.
A review of green barriers should link in with this work.
Housing allocations in Llanfairfechan need to be updated.
Colwyn Bay housing supply needs increasing.

Full text:

See attached document.

Attachments:


Our response:

Noted. Amendments to policies will be considered as part of the LDP Review process.

Support

Review Report

Representation ID: 27189

Received: 21/12/2017

Respondent: FCC Environmental (UK) Limited

Agent: Axis

Representation Summary:

Housing land allocations should be reviewed and new deliverable sites allocated
through a call for candidate sites. In addition, windfall site and allocations within and adjacent to in Tier 1 villages should not be capped in size as this limits the ability of the market to deliver housing where there is a demand and which otherwise would be consistent with the thrust of the LDP.

Full text:

See attached document.

Attachments:


Our response:

Noted. Amendments to policies will be considered as part of the LDP Review process.