5.2.1

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Object

Review Report

Representation ID: 27161

Received: 22/12/2017

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd

Representation Summary:

The HBF does not believe it is right to state that the build rate is 'extremely ambitious', as it was proven and agreed at the time of the plans adoption.

Full text:

The HBF does not believe it is right to state that the build rate is 'extremely ambitious', as it was proven and agreed at the time of the plans adoption.


Our response:

Not accepted. The point of this paragraph is that in comparison with recent build rates the Council maintain that building 435 per year is extremely ambitious. The housing requirement will be reviewed using the latest evidence as part of the LDP review process.

Comment

Review Report

Representation ID: 27186

Received: 20/12/2017

Respondent: Campaign for the Protection of Rural Wales

Representation Summary:

I find the report to be a thorough, comprehensive and valuable document. It has been clear for some time that the currently adopted LDP has become out of date in respect of housing, such that the Plan has arguably lost credibility by its inability to control the location of new housing. Whilst housing seems to me to be the key element that needs to be reassessed clearly there are other aspects of the Plan that need to be amended particularly to reflect the needs of recalculated population projections.

Full text:

See attached document.

Attachments:


Our response:

Noted.

Object

Review Report

Representation ID: 27215

Received: 22/12/2017

Respondent: Anwyl Construction Ltd

Agent: P L Planning

Representation Summary:

The build rate is not 'extremely ambitious'. The evidence at Examination supported it including capacity in the housebuilding industry along with housing need. The current LHMA (2016-2021) shows a need for at least 199 affordable housing units per year.

Full text:

See attached document.

Attachments:


Our response:

Not accepted. The point of this paragraph is that in comparison with recent build rates the Council maintain that building 435 per year is extremely ambitious. The housing requirement will be reviewed using the latest evidence as part of the LDP review process.

Object

Review Report

Representation ID: 27233

Received: 22/12/2017

Respondent: Beech Developments (NW) Ltd

Agent: P L Planning

Representation Summary:

The build rate is not 'extremely ambitious'. The evidence at Examination supported it including capacity in the housebuilding industry along with housing need. The current LHMA (2016-2021) shows a need for at least 199 affordable housing units per year.

Full text:

See attached document.

Attachments:


Our response:

Not accepted. The point of this paragraph is that in comparison with recent build rates the Council maintain that building 435 per year is extremely ambitious. The housing requirement will be reviewed using the latest evidence as part of the LDP review process.

Object

Review Report

Representation ID: 27251

Received: 22/12/2017

Respondent: Macbryde Homes Ltd

Agent: P L Planning

Representation Summary:

The build rate is not 'extremely ambitious'. The evidence at Examination supported it including capacity in the housebuilding industry along with housing need. The current LHMA (2016-2021) shows a need for at least 199 affordable housing units per year.

Full text:

See attached document.

Attachments:


Our response:

Not accepted. The point of this paragraph is that in comparison with recent build rates the Council maintain that building 435 per year is extremely ambitious. The housing requirement will be reviewed using the latest evidence as part of the LDP review process.