4.4

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

Review Report

Representation ID: 27171

Received: 22/12/2017

Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd

Representation Summary:

The current commentary on windfall sites is one sides and does not include a number of the factors that could have an effect on the level of windfall development.

Full text:

The HBF do not consider that this paragraph on windfall's currently provides all sides of the story. There are many factors which could affect the level of windfall development, firstly the windfall level could have been set at an unrealistic level so was never going to be achieved. Secondly by their nature there is not an unlimited supply of windfall sites and no guarantee of when they will come forward so their availability is likely to reduce over time, both of these points should be included within the paragraph. Further if it is just down to small sites as explained in the paragraph it would help to provide some data to support this.

Object

Review Report

Representation ID: 27208

Received: 22/12/2017

Respondent: Anwyl Construction Ltd

Agent: P L Planning

Representation Summary:

Failure to deliver the envisaged number of windfalls: The windfall allowance was calculated by using a 5 year past trend and doubling it. As the Inspector reported (para 5.35) "simply doubling this figure by way of extrapolation to 2022 introduces a greater degree of uncertainty...". The Plan also relies on a high percentage of windfalls (29%) coming forward. The risk of failure from windfall not being achieved was therefore reasonably predictable.

Full text:

See attached document.

Object

Review Report

Representation ID: 27226

Received: 22/12/2017

Respondent: Beech Developments (NW) Ltd

Agent: P L Planning

Representation Summary:

Failure to deliver the envisaged number of windfalls: The windfall allowance was calculated by using a 5 year past trend and doubling it. As the Inspector reported (para 5.35) "simply doubling this figure by way of extrapolation to 2022 introduces a greater degree of uncertainty...". The Plan also relies on a high percentage of windfalls (29%) coming forward. The risk of failure from windfall not being achieved was therefore reasonably predictable.

Full text:

See attached document.

Object

Review Report

Representation ID: 27244

Received: 22/12/2017

Respondent: Macbryde Homes Ltd

Agent: P L Planning

Representation Summary:

Failure to deliver the envisaged number of windfalls: The windfall allowance was calculated by using a 5 year past trend and doubling it. As the Inspector reported (para 5.35) "simply doubling this figure by way of extrapolation to 2022 introduces a greater degree of uncertainty...". The Plan also relies on a high percentage of windfalls (29%) coming forward. The risk of failure from windfall not being achieved was therefore reasonably predictable.

Full text:

See attached document.