Cymraeg
Object
Preferred Strategy
Representation ID: 27948
Received: 20/09/2019
Respondent: Cadnant Planning
We raise an objection to Strategic Site 3 in Old Colwyn. We consider that Candidate Site 162 would be a much more logical site to accomodate the housing needs of the settlement. Candidate Site 162 would form a logical extension to the built up form of the settlement which would be bounded naturally by an existing employment uses.
We raise an objection to Strategic Site 3 in Old Colwyn. We consider that Candidate Site 162 would be a much more logical site to accomodate the housing needs of the settlement. Candidate Site 162 would form a logical extension to the built up form of the settlement which would be bounded naturally by an existing employment uses.
Not accepted. Site 162 is less sustainable in terms of proximity to local amenities and traffic impact on the five-ways roundabout. By comparison, strategic site 3 has better links to local amenities and bus services, presents an alternative opportunity for traffic flows east bound and consists of a rounding off/settlement extension rather than ribbon-type development.