Object

Candidate Site Register

Representation ID: 27683

Received: 12/09/2019

Respondent: Mr David Williams

Representation Summary:

This site was previously rejected. It's a narrow cul de sac with 2 sharp bends. Access is already restricted with parked vechicles on the road. Service vechicles struggle to manoeuvre and emergency vehicles can be obstructed and this is with the resident population as it currently stands. An increase is traffic will exacerbate this issue.
The development of the land will destroy the habitat for bats, foxes, badgers, frogs, newts and girds. Development should not take place on green land but on more suitable brownfield and infill sites

Change suggested by respondent:

I request that this site (5) is removed from the RDLP. There are sites with better and safer access, which should be considered. The protection of green land should be a priority and more imaginative consideration given to the redevelopment of brownfield and infill sites

Full text:

This site was previously rejected. It's a narrow cul de sac with 2 sharp bends. Access is already restricted with parked vechicles on the road. Service vechicles struggle to manoeuvre and emergency vehicles can be obstructed and this is with the resident population as it currently stands. An increase is traffic will exacerbate this issue.
The development of the land will destroy the habitat for bats, foxes, badgers, frogs, newts and girds. Development should not take place on green land but on more suitable brownfield and infill sites


Our response:

Noted. Candidate sites such as this one are currently being assessed for suitability for inclusion in the Deposit LDP. If selected then the site will appear on the proposals map as an allocation/inside the settlement boundary. This will be subject to further public consultation at Deposit LDP stage.