Object

Candidate Site Register

Representation ID: 27608

Received: 05/09/2019

Respondent: Mr Edward Adams

Representation Summary:

This should be considered along with 101 & 65. If either of those would be accepted then this one would also have to be accepted as it is separated from Pathacres only by the narrow bridleway. This area would enable a large housing estate to be developed in a countryside. Vehicular access seems only through gate on bridleway. Lane is eroded with existing use. The narrowness of the lane & its use as a bridleway & walkaway make it unsuitable for extra traffic. If approved undoubtedly land to the south will be proposed for development.

Change suggested by respondent:

Retain as agricultural land and unspoilt countryside

Full text:

This should be considered along with 101 & 65. If either of those would be accepted then this one would also have to be accepted as it is separated from Pathacres only by the narrow bridleway. This area would enable a large housing estate to be developed in a countryside. Vehicular access seems only through gate on bridleway. Lane is eroded with existing use. The narrowness of the lane & its use as a bridleway & walkaway make it unsuitable for extra traffic. If approved undoubtedly land to the south will be proposed for development.


Our response:

Noted. Candidate sites such as this one are currently being assessed for suitability for inclusion in the Deposit LDP. If selected then the site will appear on the proposals map as an allocation/inside the settlement boundary. This will be subject to further public consultation at Deposit LDP stage.